UM-GPT · Product design concept

Turning course information into an actionable plan.

I designed an assignment tracker that helps students move from asking UM-GPT a question to organizing the work that follows—without rebuilding the same deadlines in another app.

RoleProduct Designer
TimelineJan–Apr 2026
TeamIndividual project
StatusInteractive concept, not shipped
UM-GPT assignment tracker dashboard showing course progress and upcoming work.
The final dashboard makes the product and its purpose visible immediately.

Answers were available. A plan was not.

Students could ask UM-GPT about a course, but still needed another tool to track assignments, deadlines, and workload. After asking students what they wished the product could do, I prioritized assignment planning from several early feature directions.

Design challenge: Help students turn course material into an understandable, editable plan while keeping them—not the system—in control.
Early sketches exploring academic-support features for UM-GPT.
Early exploration helped narrow several possible feature gaps into one focused planning workflow.

One flow from syllabus to schedule.

The concept keeps course context, assignment details, and deadline visibility together—while every generated task remains reviewable and editable by the student.

UM-GPT syllabus upload screen.
01 · Capture

Start with the syllabus.

Upload a syllabus to begin an editable assignment plan.

UM-GPT assignment detail screen.
02 · Act

Make the work manageable.

Review details, estimate effort, and work through subtasks.

UM-GPT integrated assignment calendar.
03 · Plan

See deadlines together.

Understand the week without recreating the same information elsewhere.

A connected experience, not another disconnected tool.

The high-fidelity prototype moves from syllabus upload to an editable assignment and weekly calendar, keeping progress and next actions visible throughout.

Animated walkthrough of the UM-GPT assignment planning prototype.
Interactive walkthrough of the final assignment-planning flow.
Heuristic evaluation notes for the UM-GPT prototype.

The smallest interactions shaped trust.

Lightweight testing exposed friction that was easy to overlook in a large concept. I used those findings to make the flow more predictable and direct.

Repair the return path

Buttons did not always return users where expected, so I corrected navigation and made each next state predictable.

Remove the extra interaction

An indirect control added unnecessary work where a direct click was more familiar. I simplified the interaction.

Make system status visible

Clear progress, deadlines, and completion states helped users understand what happened and what remained.

A high-fidelity proposal built to make AI output useful.

I independently researched, designed, and prototyped the feature, then shared it with my instructor, class, and UM-GPT representatives. It remains an academic proposal—not a shipped product—but demonstrates how AI can support planning while people retain the judgment to edit, prioritize, and act.